Cities Pick up Pace on Reparations Efforts, and Controversy Follows

A Juneteenth celebration in St. Paul last year included a rally for reparations.

A Juneteenth celebration in St. Paul last year included a rally for reparations. UCG/Contributor via Getty Images

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

Localities are devising programs to provide redress for racial discrimination. But implementing them has brought out the critics.

The movement for cities to provide reparations to African American residents for decades of racially discriminatory policies and practices has gained momentum this spring. But making good on the promise is likely to be a lengthy, complicated and controversial process. 

In cities such as St. Louis; Evanston, Illinois; Providence, Rhode Island; St. Paul, Minnesota; Asheville, North Carolina; and Berkeley, California, reparations programs have taken shape over the past year and are now moving into new phases. 

Earlier this month, St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones signed a bill allowing taxpayers to voluntarily donate to a reparations fund. Her administration characterized it as a “first step on a topic that needs careful attention and deliberate, studied implementation.” But when the city’s aldermen advanced the measure, some expressed concern about the lack of detail about who would be eligible to receive the funds or how the application process would work. 

Evanston is much further along in the process of disbursing funds from its reparations fund, the first one created and launched. That also means its program is attracting more scrutiny and criticism. Under the program, Black residents who lived in Evanston between 1919 and 1969 are automatically eligible for $25,000 grants to cover mortgages or home repair and upgrade costs. Almost immediately, critics said that the limits on what the money could be spent on made it “fake reparations.” 

The Evanston initiative also has come under fire for its limits on who is eligible for the program. For example, people who moved away from the city because they were denied the opportunity to purchase a home cannot apply for grants. Evanston officials say the housing voucher program is just a first step and that the city felt the need to prioritize people who personally experienced past discrimination. 

Meanwhile, conservative activist organizations have criticized reparations programs in Evanston and elsewhere, and are laying the groundwork for legal challenges across the country. They argue that the initiatives unconstitutionally discriminate on the basis of race. 

Committees and Commissions

Nevertheless, reparations programs continue to spread. In March, the Berkeley City Council voted to consider hiring a consultant to help establish a reparations process.

In a report recommending the move, city council member Ben Bartlett said a wide spectrum of discriminatory actions against African Americans justify redress. “The spectrum,” he wrote, “includes Jim Crow, voting restrictions, redlining, denial of remedies in civil court, inability to join labor unions, employment discrimination, criminal justice abuse, mass incarceration, denial of access to capital by lenders, denial of federal land grants, and housing loan guarantees, concentrated exposure to pollution, and inequitable access to education.” Many such actions were sanctioned by federal, state and local governments, Bartlett said.

Some cities are seeking to learn from what others have experienced in setting up reparations systems. Last month, Providence, Rhode Island, Mayor Jorge Elorza signed an executive order creating a commission to study what other cities have done and make recommendations for implementing its own program. The effort is part of the middle phase of the city’s “Truth-Telling, Reconciliation and Municipal Reparations” initiative. 

“By engaging those who have been directly impacted by actions outlined during our Truth-Telling phase, this framework demonstrates that history isn’t something that just happened in the past but is actively shaping present-day outcomes for African heritage and Indigenous Providence residents,” said Elorza

Likewise, St. Paul’s reparations committee is conducting a series of community sessions to gather feedback on their work to set up a commission to address ways to provide compensation for historical disparities in the treatment of its residents.  

Laboratories of Experimentation

In at least one case, a town is hoping to become the recipient of reparations funds rather than the issuer of such payments. Mayor Keisha Currin of Tullahassee, Oklahoma, says the town once thrived with commercial and civic activity. Now it has only 83 residents, and many of its buildings and homes are dilapidated or gone. The slow decline was a direct result of government policy, Currin has argued, ranging from enacting Jim Crow segregation laws to failing to prevent violence against African Americans. 

Currin, who has a full-time job at the U.S. Veterans Affairs Department, recruited Cymone Davis, a former educator in Kansas City, Missouri, to move to Oklahoma and help in the effort. In 2020 Davis received a grant under the Tulsa Remote program, which offers $10,000 payments to out-of-state residents who agree to move to the city. She later became Tullahassee’s town manager.

Currin is a member of Mayors Organized for Reparations and Equality, an alliance dedicated to pushing municipal reparations efforts. “Our coalition stands on the belief that cities can—and should—act as laboratories for bold ideas that can be transformative for racial and economic justice on a larger scale,” the group’s mission statement reads, “and demonstrate for the country how to pursue and improve initiatives that take a reparatory approach to confronting and dismantling structural and institutional racism.”

There’s a long history of cities and states incubating policies and programs before they are implemented at the federal level. But some analysts argue that is a misguided approach when it comes to reparations. A national problem demands a federal government solution, they say.

“Once a political hot potato, the label ‘reparations' suddenly is being applied to a variety of acts of individual and community atonement,” wrote A. Kirsten Mullen and William A. Darity Jr. in The Washington Post last year. Mullen and Darity are the authors of From Here to Equality: Reparations for Black Americans in the Twenty-First Century. That stretches the term to the breaking point, they say.

Evanston’s experiment, for example, is “a good step for the city to take, but let’s be clear: This is a housing voucher program, not reparations—and calling it that does more harm than good,” Mullen and Darity wrote. True reparations for the economic harm done to African Americans, they argue, would cost $14 trillion and can only be accomplished at the federal level. States and localities simply don’t have the funds to implement meaningful programs. 

Whether or not initiatives to provide financial redress to African Americans should all be labeled “reparations,” there is an increasing recognition among civic leaders that government at all levels has much to atone for. In his 2017 book The Color of Law, Richard Rothstein laid out the case that a series of official actions was decisive in creating a segregated America.

“Our system of official segregation was not the result of a single law that consigned African Americans to designated neighborhoods,” Rothstein wrote. “Rather, scores of racially explicit laws, regulations and government practices combined to create a nationwide system of urban ghettos, surrounded by white suburbs. Private discrimination also played a role, but it would have been considerably less effective had it not been embraced and reinforced by government.”

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.