As Self-Driving Cars Hit the Streets, New Equity Concerns Emerge

A woman waits to ride on the self-driving low speed multi-passenger electric shuttle, called Bear Tracks, in White Bear Lake, Minnesota.

A woman waits to ride on the self-driving low speed multi-passenger electric shuttle, called Bear Tracks, in White Bear Lake, Minnesota. Michael Siluk/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

States and localities will have a key role in ensuring vulnerable communities aren’t harmed by the new transportation technology, or miss out on its benefits.

State and local officials need to act proactively to make sure that widespread use of self-driving vehicles doesn’t leave out historically disadvantaged communities, a team of researchers from the Urban Institute warned in a new report.

The researchers said a broad shift from human drivers to software-piloted vehicles could help poor people and non-white communities, if the technology can reduce the number of traffic deaths and cut down on the air pollution that disproportionately affects those residents. Autonomous vehicles could also increase transportation options for older people or people with disabilities, the Urban analysts said.

But none of those advantages are guaranteed, they cautioned.

“The degree to which [autonomous vehicles] change the transportation system and society overall will be mediated by regulatory choices at the local, state and federal levels,” the researchers wrote in their report.

“If [autonomous vehicles] ultimately reinforce inequitable access to transportation, reduce public transit use, increase [the amount of driving], increase congestion and exacerbate the causes of climate change, this technological advancement may ultimately fall short of its full promise—or even worsen the existing problems endemic to the automobile-dominated US transportation system,” they added.

The issue is increasingly salient, as fully autonomous taxis have started serving passengers in San Francisco (with plans to expand to Phoenix and Austin). Meanwhile, both General Motors and Ford have asked the federal government to produce cars that don’t have basic controls for human drivers, such as steering wheels or rear-view mirrors—a request that city transportation officials have opposed.

Automakers and their allies emphasize the potential that autonomous vehicles have for improving roadways, even if they don’t change how much Americans depend on cars and trucks to get around.

“I think the real question is not whether AVs [autonomous vehicles] are equitable, but are AVs more equitable than existing transportation? If the answer to that question is ‘yes,’ that’s good. That’s progress,” said Hilary Cain, the vice president for technology, innovation and mobility policy at the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an auto industry group.

Cain told participants during an Urban Institute event that autonomous vehicles could provide transportation options to people in transit deserts. The self-driving cars could also expand the reach of bus and subway networks by connecting people to stations they otherwise might live too far away from to easily use, she said.

She also expressed confidence that technology onboard autonomous vehicles would be better than human drivers at detecting pedestrians, which could help reduce the growing toll of U.S. traffic deaths.

Anil Lewis, the executive director for blindness initiatives at the National Federation of the Blind, said autonomous vehicles could also improve the range of destinations someone in an underserved community could reach.

“As a black male who grew up in Atlanta, Georgia, I lived in inner-city neighborhoods that had access to public transportation. But I didn’t have access to areas that public transportation wouldn’t get me to,” he said. “That prohibited me from accessing jobs, specific entertainment venues, [et cetera]. So it’s not just about living in a transportation desert. It’s about opening up the world to everyone equally.”

More autonomous vehicles would help people who are blind or have disabilities, as well as people who break their legs or suffer from other temporary disabilities, Lewis added.

Role for States and Cities

But the Urban report stressed that states and cities can also improve the equity outcomes of autonomous vehicles, if they play an assertive role in areas such as ride-hailing operations and street design.

The researchers noted that, as of this summer, lawmakers in 41 states and the District of Columbia have passed a total of 122 laws related to autonomous vehicles. 

“Since no federal legislation thus far has directly addressed AVs and no federal departments have introduced binding regulations on AV design or manufacture, states have generally acted alone. Legislative approaches to AV regulations vary immensely between states,” the Urban researchers added.

Yonah Freemark, an influential figure in urbanist circles and one of the authors of the report, presented its findings at the event last week. The report’s other authors are Christina Stacy, Olivia Fiol and Jorge Morales-Burnett.

They suggested several ways that state and local governments could shape autonomous vehicle outcomes, even though the federal government makes almost all decisions regarding vehicle design.

One of the most basic things states and localities could do is require the auto owners to report on how their vehicles are performing, which could “identify negative externalities” that the vehicles cause, the Urban researchers wrote.  

The researchers outlined other ways that local officials could improve outcomes, including:

  • Offering owners credits if they can prove they powered their vehicles with renewable energy.
  • Taxing the “empty” miles AVs drive without passengers, a policy that could be expanded to non-autonomous vehicles, too.
  • Adjust fees on ride-hailing trips to encourage shared rides, rather than individual ones.
  • Impose guarantees that autonomous vehicles would service all sections of a community.
  • Encourage ride-hailing operators with autonomous vehicles to offer ways of summoning them that don’t depend on a smartphone or bank account, through the use of phone calls, kiosks or other methods.
  • Add subsidies for rides linked to transit trips.

If autonomous vehicles prove to be safer than human drivers, localities could impose geographic restrictions for places where only autonomous vehicles could operate.

“Localities could more rapidly implement geofencing in downtown, low car-ownership neighborhoods, shopping centers and other employment areas with fewer equity concerns, especially if they simultaneously improve public transportation services,” the Urban researchers wrote.  

“This approach has the potential to transform often dangerous streets into multi-use places that preserve the ability for vehicle movement but also allow for child’s play and other public use. Localities could also use geofencing to establish pedestrian zones, which would prevent any vehicles—including AVs—from entering sensitive areas,” they added.

City Officials Weigh in With Feds

But the National Association of City Transportation Officials has cautioned that the rapid rollout of autonomous vehicles “will not result in substantive safety, sustainability or equity gains” without a major overhaul of how streets are designed.

The group called on federal regulators to deny requests from Ford and General Motors to allow specially designed autonomous vehicles on the road.

General Motors asked the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for exemptions from safety standards for its Origin vehicles, which do not have a steering wheel, pedals, manual turn signals or mirrors. The vehicles also have carriage-style seating, meaning people in the front seat sit facing backward while occupants in the rear seat face forward.

Ford is also asking for exemptions, but its proposal is markedly different from GM’s. Ford’s vehicle (it did not provide a name) could run in either autonomous or human-operated modes. Occupants could not switch between those modes while the vehicle is running, and Ford intends that only specially trained drivers would be able to operate them. The vehicles would be part of fleets for ride-hailing and package delivery services and would not be available to individual customers.

Still, NACTO objected to both proposals for similar reasons. The group said the petitions don’t show that the cars would operate safely when they are automated.

Vehicle manufacturers should “physically demonstrate” to federal regulators how the technology would work to replace safety features like rearview mirrors or tire pressure gauges, including what backup systems are in place if the software fails.

When federal safety regulations are applied to automated driving systems, NACTO argued, “the goal should also be to provide safety information to the passengers so a passenger can identify whether or not they are in a defective vehicle.”

NACTO said neither automaker met that standard.

The city transportation officials noted their group included many members who have overseen the deployment of autonomous vehicles on their streets.

But NACTO was wary of the car manufacturers’ claims that putting more autonomous vehicles on the street would improve equity by expanding the availability of services like app-based ride-booking.

“Numerous evaluations of the outcomes of ride hail services have found that ride hail increases total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and does not meaningfully improve transportation security for underserved populations,” NACTO wrote in letters to the federal regulators.

The group pointed to evidence that suggests older adults are less likely to use app-hailed transportation services, like Lyft and Uber. The letters also highlighted gaps with regulations to ensure that a substantial portion of ride-booking fleets are wheelchair accessible. 

NACTO even warned that more autonomous vehicles could result in more dangerous streets, particularly because the vehicles would tend to be heavier than traditional cars and trucks and would therefore be more likely to hurt people in a crash.

If NHTSA allows the automakers to get their exemption, the city transportation officials asked the federal government to tighten the conditions for doing so. 

For example, they asked for a limit of 250 vehicles deployed to any one city, an ability for city officials to limit where in a city they can operate, a phone number to be displayed on self-driving vehicles that the public can use to report driving concerns, and access by city officials to safety data NHTSA collects from the automakers on the performance of the vehicles.

The federal agency that will decide whether to grant the exemptions is also working on broader efforts to accommodate autonomous vehicles within its regulatory framework. But NHTSA has missed many congressional deadlines for updating regulations and critics say it’s been too deferential to automakers.

Cain, the auto industry representative at the Urban event, expressed confidence that NHTSA would ensure a smooth transition to autonomous vehicles.

“NHTSA’s job is literally to make sure that vehicles on the U.S. roadways are safe. And that is why they're going through the process,” she said. “I think we have to have faith that they are going to do their job, and that, once they release updated regulations, that they will strike that balance of allowing for the innovative potential of this technology while also preserving motor vehicle safety.”

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.