What 15 Secretaries of State Think of Voter ID Rules

Connecticut Secretary of the State Denise Merrill

Connecticut Secretary of the State Denise Merrill Jessica Hill / AP Photo

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

As the National Association of Secretaries of State meets in the nation’s capital, here is what some of them feel about a hot-button political topic.

WASHINGTON — President Trump’s baseless but consistent claims of widespread voter fraud in the November elections have roiled many elections administration officials, including secretaries of state.

Those accusations have punctuated the ongoing political debate over voter identification laws, which are a topic of discussion as the National Association of Secretaries of State meets this week for its four-day winter meeting in the nation’s capital.

The 2016 presidential election was the first since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down parts of the Voting Rights Act. And the nonpartisan Brookings Institution found 14 of 20 states with “restrictive voting laws” like voter ID had them take effect last year to intentionally discriminate against and “systematically disenfranchise minorities, young people, and the poor.”

Connecticut Secretary of the State Denise Merrill, a Democrat who currently serves as NASS president, was among the first to speak out publicly against Trump’s unsubstantiated claims of illegal voting—rhetoric that’s become commonplace among conservatives—in an emailed statement:

“Our democracy is the most transparent in the world. Our voter rolls are public information and elections officials are honorable public servants who carry out their tasks in an open and accessible manner. To claim, without a shred of evidence, that millions of ‘illegal votes’ were cast does nothing but undermine people’s confidence in democracy. Working to undercut the public’s faith in a free and fair vote is beyond irresponsible, it is frankly un-American. What’s worse, I fear that these lies are being stated in order to lay the groundwork for a draconian assault on voting rights. I sincerely hope I am proven wrong.”

Merrill isn’t alone in her thinking, but she’s also certainly not unopposed. Ahead of Thursday’s NASS conference session on voter confidence, Route Fifty put together a sampling of where secretaries of state stand on voter identification laws.

New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, a Democrat, has had his hands full refuting senior Trump adviser Stephen Miller’s unfounded accusation Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” that thousands of voters were bussed in from Massachusetts to illegally cast ballots. “It really concerns me and bothers me that half the population believe there is voter fraud,” Gardner told the Concord Monitor. “And if people believe there is voter fraud, the value of the ballot is lessened and people don’t go out of their way to vote anymore.” The state has a strict photo ID requirement, which Gardner defended saying only 1,124 of the approximately 755,000 people who voted in November lacked an ID or were unfamiliar to election officials.

Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican, has rebuffed the notion that the state’s recently passed, non-strict, non-photo ID requirement is too expensive to implement—saying he can do it for $1.5 million so long as efforts to educate the public on the changes are limited. Registered voters will be allowed to vote without photo IDs, he said, according to St. Louis Public Radio.

Nevada Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske, a Republican, has said voter fraud is not a problem in the state, despite state Assembly Republicans introducing a voter ID bill earlier this month. “There is no evidence of voters illegally casting ballots at the most recent election in Nevada,” Cegavske said, according to the Reno Gazette-Journal. “The Secretary of State’s office is aware of attempted fraud related to voter registration in Nevada; however, with the help of local election officials, we were able to investigate and make one arrest.”

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a Republican, urged the state legislature to pass a law requiring a photo ID and proof of citizenship at the polls, which it did in 2011. But earlier this month a civil rights advisory panel found the law “may have been written and implemented with improper, discriminatory intent,” reported The Kansas City Star, and as the strictest in the nation should be investigated further by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division.

Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate, a Republican, introduced the “Election Integrity Act” in the state House earlier this month, which would mail voter IDs to every registered voter. “No voter will be excluded and no eligible voter will be turned away at the polls," Pate said, according to The Des Moine Register. The state currently has no ID requirement and boasts some of the highest voter participation in the U.S., without any evidence of fraud.

North Dakota Secretary of State Al Jaeger, a Republican, has been hit with a lawsuit arguing voter ID laws passed in 2013 and 2015 disenfranchised Native Americans disproportionately, but that hasn’t stopped Republican lawmakers from proposing more changes. New state legislation would require a driver’s license, ID card, tribal ID or else supplemental, up-to-date documents to vote, according to the Grand Forks Herald.

Montana Secretary of State Corey Stapleton, a Republican, has indicated he’s open to any legislation addressing voter fraud, and at least one Republican legislator is looking to toughen the state’s non-strict, non-photo ID requirement, reported Montana Public Radio.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, a Democrat, told The San Diego Union-Tribune in a recent interview that it’s no coincidence that many states have rushed to change how elections are done since the Supreme Court heard the Shelby v. Holder case:

It is creatively written voter ID that’s very intentional. Things like in certain states well, what count as your ID? License, passport, et cetera. Gun permit? Yes. But a state university ID … so that’s all of a sudden state issued ID doesn’t. That’s not a coincidence. Things like how people manage their voter rolls. Are they overly aggressive in purging the voter rolls in a way that hurts low propensity voters? Is it either in some states the reduction of early voting opportunities or the elimination of early voting opportunities or where that happens county by county? You know, Alabama may be one of the most egregious cases where no sooner than they passed their voter ID law then they closed DMV offices in the county with the highest percentages of African-American population. Coincidence? You decide.

Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill, a Republican, has called voting a “privilege” when criticizing automatic registration and said citizens need to “show some initiative” if they want to exercise their right to vote, according to AL.com. The state has a non-strict photo ID requirement and purges its rolls every four years.

Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos, a Republican, expressed confidence in the state’s election system following Trump’s allegations of voter fraud and Gov. Greg Abbott echoing the president’s concerns. "We have multiple layers of safeguards in place to prevent illegal voting and remain constantly vigilant to guarantee that the voices of Texans at the ballot box are not muted by those who attempt to engage in abuse or fraud within our election system," Pablos said, according to The Texas Tribune. "In the State of Texas, we have taken and will continue to take all allegations of illegal voting very seriously." The state passed a strict voter photo ID law in 2011 that the U.S. Supreme Court stuck down in January, but further legal appeals are expected.

Washington Secretary of State Kim Wyman, a Republican, was critical of Trump’s claims of a “rigged” election prior to his win and stuck to her guns, when he first floated the idea of a federal investigation into voter fraud in January. According to Seattle Weekly, Wyman issued this statement:

“As Secretary of State, I take any allegations of voter fraud seriously and am eager to review any evidence President Trump has, or his investigation might uncover, to support his assertion. However, as I stated when he raised this issue last fall, I am confident the election system in Washington state is secure and prevents illegal voting. Our county elections offices and our State Elections Division have multiple safeguards in place to prevent illegal voting, and there is no evidence that illegal voting took place anywhere in our state during the 2016 election.”

The state has a non-strict, non-photo ID requirement, and Wyman wants to require proof of citizenship at the ballot box with automatic registration for citizens as an opt-out.

Rhode Island Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea, a Democrat, has said she’d support an effort to overturn the state’s 5-year-old, non-strict photo ID requirement. "We continue to work with local elections authorities to ensure that our voting lists are up to date and accurate,” she said, after Trump’s comments about illegal voting, according to the Providence Journal. “It is outrageous that the president continues to make unsubstantiated claims about alleged widespread voter fraud."

Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, a Democrat, told the Bangor Daily News that voter IDs are a “political issue,” after Republican Gov. Paul LePage called the state’s system “illegitimate” for not requiring them at the ballot box ahead of the 2016 election. The state’s House, mostly Democratic, last killed an attempt to enact voter IDs in 2015. “It’s curious that the governor would question the integrity of a system under which he was elected twice,” Dunlap said.

Virginia Secretary of the Commonwealth Kelly Thomasson, a Democrat, hasn’t weighed in on the state’s strict photo ID requirement, but she has helped Gov. Terry McAuliffe restore voting rights to felons who completed their sentences and parole or probation—arguing their disenfranchisement “was rooted in the dark history of discrimination against minorities,” reported Talk Media News. The state House passed a bill requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, legislation the governor is expected to veto should it pass the Senate.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.