Despite the controversy, cities are still turning to rent control to address the housing crisis

Renters' rights groups rally outside the Massachusetts State House in Boston in 2020.

Renters' rights groups rally outside the Massachusetts State House in Boston in 2020. Lane Turner/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

Many cities have adopted rent control measures in the past year to help with the high cost of housing. But the approach has had less success in statehouses, where opponents argue it’s ineffective.

As cities and states continue to grapple with the affordable housing crisis—now without much of the federal aid made available during the pandemic—rent control proposals are a hot topic of debate. The measures appear to be garnering support in city halls and among tenant organizers, but are finding less success in statehouses. 

“There's a number of advocates that are trying to work on rent stabilization,” said Marie Claire Tran-Leung, evictions initiative project director at the National Housing Law Project.

“Especially in light of inflation and rising rents over the last year, [there’s] an acknowledgement that there needs to be relief for tenants in some way.”

Still, rent control proposals have failed in several states this year. Even in places where measures have been approved, it hasn’t exactly been smooth sailing.

Measures meant to regulate rent—which typically involve capping how much landlords can increase lease payments—is a controversial practice. Some advocates say they keep residents in their homes, connected to familiar communities and protected from rent-gouging landlords. While opponents note that rent control can reduce maintenance funds—leading to low-quality housing—and sometimes fails to reach low-income households, allowing higher earners the opportunity to benefit from the cap.

Despite research underscoring the pitfalls of rent control, there’s been a massive push from residents and local officials to employ such measures, according to Jim Lapides, spokesperson for the National Multifamily Housing Council.

“The challenge for local elected officials is that they don't have a ton of levers that they can pull,” Lapides said. “We believe that the best way to help someone who can't afford the rent is to provide subsidies… but at the local level, politicians don't have the same kind of funding that you do at the federal level.” 

At the end of last year, it looked as though 2023 was poised to be a big year for rent control, particularly after voters approved measures in several cities.

Last November, for instance, three localities in California—Pasadena, Richmond and Santa Monica—all approved measures to cap rent. In Portland, Maine, voters approved a measure that reduced the percentage landlords could increase rent by, and last month, rejected a ballot initiative that would have rolled back those changes.

This year, some cities have expanded rent control policies in response to rapidly increasing housing costs. Newark, New Jersey, approved a measure that caps increases at 5% annually and now includes newer buildings. (Rent control is often applied only to older buildings to avoid discouraging new development.) Washington, D.C.’s rent cap was reworked to limit rent increases to 6% for the next two years. And lawmakers in Oregon, which was the first state to establish statewide rent control in 2019, voted last week to cap increases at 10%.

But by and large, rent control proposals nationwide have not performed particularly well. Expanding an existing ordinance is one thing, but creating and passing a new policy, it seems, is an entirely different beast. 

Several months ago, it seemed possible that Nevada would adopt rent control as the powerful Culinary Workers Union spent several months advocating for such measures in North Las Vegas. It was the first time since the 1970s that the state has seen an organized effort calling for rent control, according to The Nevada Independent. But organizers ultimately failed to gather enough signatures to go on the ballot, and an effort to get the state legislature to back a bill that would’ve tied rent increases to inflation also failed.

Unlike most other states, Nevada doesn’t preempt rent control. But in those that do, there were a handful of rent stabilization bills considered this year that would have established a statewide cap or at least permitted localities to administer rent control. 

In Colorado, for instance, where the practice has been outlawed for more than four decades, a proposal seeking to allow local governments to cap rent increases failed in committee in April. Similarly, in Washington state a measure that would have capped rents at 3%, or at inflation up to 7%, died halfway through the legislative session. 

Massachusetts has yet to make a decision on a bill that would allow rent control in Boston. In an effort to combat high rent costs there, Mayor Michele Wu and the city council have been pushing a rent stabilization measure that would cap some Boston rents at 10% increases year-over-year. The bill, however, appears to be gaining little traction among state lawmakers, and has sat in the housing committee since April. 

Even in communities where rent control measures have been adopted, the implementation has met obstacles.

Residents in Orange County, Florida, for example, voted in November in favor of an ordinance that would have prevented apartment owners from raising rent at a rate higher than inflation. Before it went into effect, however, the measure got tied up in court, and then was made obsolete when Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the Live Local Act, which supersedes any rent control efforts at the local level. 

Two years ago, St. Paul, Minnesota, passed one of the tightest rent control regulations in the country, capping increases to 3% annually. Earlier this year, an amendment to the ordinance bumped that cap to 8% plus inflation—which this year comes out to a 15% cap on increases. But the ordinance makes allowances for rising expenses and lets landlords file for exemptions. Last month, the St. Paul Pioneer Press reported that about one-third of rental units in the city—or about 26,000—were exempt from the cap.

What’s more, data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development showed that new housing permits in St. Paul dropped by nearly 50% in the year following the enactment of the rent control ordinance. Local officials have said HUD data may differ from local data, and it's too soon to tell whether the drop is a result of the measure. In neighboring Minneapolis, which did not have rent control last year, the city saw an increase in the number of permits issued. Minneapolis typically sees more permits than St. Paul, but the gap was particularly pronounced last year, according to the Pioneer Press.

For opponents of rent control, St. Paul highlights the shortcomings of the approach, Lapides said, and makes clear that investing in affordable housing is the best solution for the current crisis.

“Today we have a supply-demand imbalance,” he said. “We just have to build more housing. In the short term, we need to provide direct assistance to people who need help today. We saw that it works through the pandemic.”

Rent control is just one of a slew of measures many tenants are pushing for. Tenant organizing has been gaining steam since the pandemic, when the volatility of many households’ living situations was revealed, said Tran-Lueng of the National Housing Law Project. Other popular approaches include laws prohibiting discrimination against sources of income—including housing vouchers—just cause eviction laws and ensuring tenants have access to legal counsel. 

“You can see, just with the increase in tenant organizing … that there's a need for more tenant protections and also an appetite for it from in our local government.”

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.