Supreme Court rules that government can ask social media platforms to remove misinformation

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, speaking with Justice Brett Kavanaugh, authored court's majority opinion, saying the lower court's ruling was "wrong."

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, speaking with Justice Brett Kavanaugh, authored court's majority opinion, saying the lower court's ruling was "wrong." Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

Justices said in a 6-3 decision that Louisiana and Missouri did not have standing to sue. The ruling comes as a relief to state and local officials as they look to crack down on election-related misinformation ahead of November.

Amid a frantic end to their term, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Louisiana and Missouri’s request to bar the federal government from asking social media platforms to remove false information.

Justices ruled 6-3 in Murthy v. Missouri that the states and the five individual social media users named in the case did not have the standing to sue. The plaintiffs alleged that the federal government, in violation of the First Amendment, pressured Facebook to censor their speech by deleting posts complaining about mask and vaccine requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The case represents a victory for the Biden administration. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy had issued a health advisory in July 2021 encouraging social media platforms to prevent misinformation about the virus “from taking hold.” 

The ruling comes as a relief ahead of November’s elections as well. Federal agencies, states and localities have been ramping up their efforts to combat the spread of misinformation. Observers worried that an adverse ruling could have chilled “platform content moderation … preserving the ability to use disinformation as a political strategy,” said Lisa Macpherson, policy director at the broadband advocacy organization Public Knowledge, in a statement.

The decision overturns the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed an earlier ruling by District Judge Terry Doughty last July that the federal government had “apparently engaged in a massive effort to suppress disfavored conservative speech.”

Writing the majority opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized the Fifth Circuit’s “sweeping preliminary injunction” and said it was “wrong” to uphold Doughty’s ruling.

“To establish standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the near future, they will suffer an injury that is traceable to a Government defendant and redressable by the injunction they seek,” Barrett wrote. “Because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing to seek a preliminary injunction.”

Barrett was joined in the majority by Chief Justice John Roberts and justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Brett Kavanaugh, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. Barrett wrote that the issues in the case “begin—and end—with standing,” and said the states do not seek to prevent social media platforms from restricting posts or accounts, but “seek to enjoin Government agencies and officials from pressuring or encouraging the platforms to suppress protected speech in the future.”

That forward-looking theory, that those that claim they have been restricted on social media in the past and so will continue to be, did not fly with most justices.

“Here, a note of caution: If the plaintiffs were seeking compensatory relief, the traceability of their past injuries would be the whole ball game,” Barrett wrote. “But because the plaintiffs are seeking only forward-looking relief, the past injuries are relevant only for their predictive value.”

Barrett also rejected what she called the “overly broad assertion” that the federal government has engaged in a “years-long pressure campaign” to censor and suppress certain viewpoints on social media, noting that platforms “had strengthened their pre-existing content moderation policies before the Government defendants got involved,” and used their own judgment to do so.

The Fifth Circuit came in for heavy criticism in Barrett’s written opinion, as she criticized the judges for “attributing every platform decision at least in part to the defendants,” and so said they “glossed over complexities in the evidence.” She also dinged the Fifth Circuit for relying on the District Court’s factual findings, “many of which unfortunately appear to be clearly erroneous,” especially when it found that social media platforms had what they described as an “efficient report-and-censor relationship.”

Finally, Barrett said plaintiffs’ claims that a “right to listen” to any content on social media is protected under the First Amendment is “startlingly broad, as it would grant all social media users the right to sue over someone else’s censorship—at least so long as they claim an interest in that person’s speech.” She said the states would have had to prove specific injuries they received if they were unable to hear unfettered speech on social media.

Three justices—Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas—dissented. In his written minority opinion, Alito called the case “one of the most important free speech cases to reach this Court in years.” He said a “coterie of officials” in the federal government “continuously harried and implicitly threatened Facebook with potentially crippling consequences if it did not comply with their wishes about the suppression of certain COVID–19-related speech.”

“Not surprisingly, Facebook repeatedly yielded,” Alito continued. He accused government officials of “coercive” censorship that was “blatantly unconstitutional.” Alito said social media platforms are an important source of news, but that they are “far more vulnerable” to government pressure and censorship than traditional news organizations.

“For these and other reasons, internet platforms have a powerful incentive to please important federal officials, and the record in this case shows that high-ranking officials skillfully exploited Facebook’s vulnerability,” Alito wrote.

The New Civil Liberties Alliance, a conservative legal group that was involved in the case, echoed Alito’s viewpoint, saying the decision opened the door to a “censorship industrial complex” that will “have grave consequences for Americans’ freedom for years to come.”

“This decision is a travesty for the First Amendment, for Americans’ rights to free speech, and for the pursuit of scientific and other knowledge,” Jenin Younes, litigation counsel for the alliance, said in a statement. “America can no longer claim to safeguard citizens’ free speech rights.”

Others praised the court for finding that content moderation decisions are not directly tied to government pressure campaigns.

“What we see in this decision is that the Court actually understands how content moderation works,” Jess Miers, senior legal advocacy counsel at the tech advocacy group Chamber of Progress, said in a statement. “Platforms have an important reason to seek information from actors like the CDC or national security leaders, but at the end of the day, their content moderation decisions and platform policies are their own.”

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.