Can states’ social media laws stand up to scrutiny?

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox speaks at an event earlier this year. Cox is one of several governors to sign social media regulations into law in a bid to protect their state's children.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox speaks at an event earlier this year. Cox is one of several governors to sign social media regulations into law in a bid to protect their state's children. George Frey via Getty Images

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

Several states have tried to regulate the space in a bid to protect young people from the worst of the platforms. But whether their plans are workable, and can withstand legal challenges, remains to be seen.

This is the second of two articles on states’ efforts to regulate social media. You can find the first article here.

When Idaho Gov. Brad Little addressed the legislature this January, he demanded action. At the top of his list, in addition to human trafficking, the war on drugs and open borders: social media.

During his State of the State address, Little called social media an  “obvious reason for the decline in youth mental health.” He said social media is addictive, can lead to cyberbullying, “replaces quality time,” and makes people “compare themselves to impossible, artificial standards for looks and lifestyles.” He called for action, as have many governors as they wrestle with the youth mental health crisis.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox was the first in the nation to sign legislation in March 2023 restricting young people’s use of social media platforms. Cox then signed amended legislation earlier this year repealing and replacing that 2023 bill under legal pressure. 

Arkansas was the next state to enact such a law; Ohio followed in July 2023. The drumbeat of legislation has accelerated this year. Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, Colorado, Texas and New York’s governors all signed social media bills into law, while Idaho’s legislation is pending. Others could follow, including California.

None of these laws have yet taken effect. Utah’s amended Minor Protection in Social Media Act is effective Oct. 1 and others are on hold pending legal challenges. Texas' law could take effect Sept. 1 or could be subject to a preliminary injunction.

But the bills themselves show how seriously lawmakers appear to take the issue, and how they are approaching it through a combination of technology, rules and regulations while navigating sometimes aged state laws in need of a refresh for the modern era. And the states' varied approaches illustrate the limits of the policy tools currently available for regulating online activity.

Age Verification Tech a Hallmark 

One unifying factor in all the laws is a reliance on age verification technology, something that has taken hold in Europe and elsewhere but has yet to overcome skepticism on these shores because of the U.S.’s lack of comprehensive data privacy legislation protecting information provided for age verification. 

Opponents argue that requiring age verification would force tech services to store information for an undisclosed amount of time, and so make them sitting ducks for cyberattacks. And tech companies themselves have struggled in the face of declining public trust, especially as they have been targets of cyber espionage themselves.

But many of the new youth social media laws are vague on what that age verification could look like. Utah initially left it up to the Division of Consumer Protection to “establish acceptable forms or methods of identification.” Its amended text puts the onus on social media companies to verify whether a user is a minor.

Florida’s law, meanwhile, says social media platforms can use “any commercially reasonable method of age verification.” It’s a similar story in Mississippi, which mandates that platforms “shall make commercially reasonable efforts to verify the age of the person creating an account with a level of certainty appropriate to the risks that arise from the information management practices of the digital service provider.”

Arkansas’ law requires that social media companies “use a third party vendor to perform reasonable age verification” and that any identifying information be deleted once a user has access. If not, those platforms face penalties of $2,500 per violation paid to the state and may be forced to pay other damages to the user’s family.

And Texas went in a different direction by requiring parental consent for a minor to open an account. Parents could give their consent via a toll-free telephone number, a video conference call or through government-issued identification documents, on the understanding that information would then be deleted.

Veronica Torres, worldwide privacy and regulatory counsel and data protection officer at age verification company Jumio, said in an interview earlier this year that federal data privacy legislation would create “a far better environment” for age verification.

The Right to Sue 

Most states have left it up to their attorneys general to enforce the law, rather than offer parents or guardians the right to sue social media companies.

In Ohio, for example, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost in a statement last year, the procedure for addressing parent complaints related to their children’s social media use is “no different” than any other time when an Ohioan feels they have been wronged by a company: If parents lodge a complaint with their attorney general’s office, that office would then be responsible for starting enforcement proceedings against social media platforms. New York’s attorney general can seek civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation of the law, which is similar to other states.

Many states require social media companies to delete a child’s account upon request within a certain timeframe, depending on the state.

Florida’s law, for example, deems a social media company’s failure to honor account termination requests an “unfair or deceptive act or practice” that can result in legal action against the platform. Civil penalties could total up to $50,000 per violation, per the bill’s text. 

Utah, however, does allow individuals to sue social media companies they believe have violated youth social media laws; successful plaintiffs are entitled to receive court costs as well as $2,500 per violation.

But that number could jump if the plaintiffs can prove they suffered “financial, physical, and emotional harm,” and if the court “determines that the harm is a direct consequence” of those violations. 

Legal Arguments

But any parental lawsuits are likely months if not years off. With the exception of Utah, all of the recent legislation has been blocked from implementation by judges, pending lawsuits designed to strike them down as unconstitutional.

In response to a lawsuit brought by tech industry advocacy group NetChoice, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked several provisions of California’s California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act designed to protect children from “potentially harmful” content. The court found that other provisions, including data minimization requirements and privacy protections being set at their highest by default, are likely constitutional. Judges sent the case back to the lower courts for more study.

“The court recognized that California’s government cannot commandeer private businesses to censor lawful content online or to restrict access to it,” Chris Marchese, director of the NetChoice Litigation Center said in a statement.

NetChoice has led the way on other litigation against states looking to regulate social media. Utah’s amended bill came in the face of a NetChoice lawsuit, while the group has also filed suit against Arkansas, Mississippi and Ohio for their restrictions. All three laws are on hold temporarily until all litigation is resolved.

NetChoice, which is backed by Google, Facebook parent Meta and X, formerly Twitter, argued in its litigation that state laws violate the First Amendment by mandating that social media platforms collect data on their users to grant them access. And NetChoice has argued that the bills—contrary to elected officials’ assertions—take rights away from parents as the government would be telling them how to parent their households.

“If HB 1126 ultimately takes effect, mandating age and identity verification for digital services will undermine privacy and stifle the free exchange of ideas,” Marchese said in a July statement after a judge temporarily blocked Mississippi’s law. “Mississippi also commandeers websites to censor broad categories of protected speech, blocking access to important educational resources. Mississippians have a First Amendment right to access lawful information online free from government censorship.”

Other groups, including the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, have filed suit against Texas’ legislation and others. Florida is braced for legal action against its law too, although as of now, no suits appear to have been filed.

And there is evidence that the bills may survive legal scrutiny. In a July decision, Robert Shelby, chief United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Utah, ruled that Utah’s age verification requirements are constitutional and are not preempted by the Communications Decency Act, the federal law regulating online pornography.

NetChoice had argued that requiring social media companies to verify user ages fell foul of the federal law’s stipulation that platforms cannot be held liable for user-posted content, a source of major debate in Congress for years. But Shelby disagreed.

He found that the law does not impose liability on platforms. “The liability NetChoice members may face for violating the provisions arises solely from the members’ use of the design features,” he continued.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.